Email this article 
(Riau University, Indonesia)(2) * Soewignjo Agus Nugroho
(Riau University, Indonesia)(3) Reni Suryanita
(Riau University, Indonesia)(4) Mamoru Kikumoto
(yokohama national university, Japan)*corresponding author
AbstractArtificial neural networks (ANN) are now widely used and are becoming popular among researchers, especially in the geotechnical field. In general, data normalization is carried out to make ANN whose range is in accordance with the activation function used. Other studies have tried to create an ANN without normalizing the data and ANN is considered capable of making predictions. In this study, a comparison of ANN with and without data normalization was carried out in predicting SPT values based on CPT data and soil physical properties on cohesive soils. The input data used in this study are the value of tip resistance, sleeve resistance, effective soil overburden pressure, liquid limit, plastic limit and percentage of sand, silt and clay. The results showed that the ANN was able to make predictions effectively both on networks with and without data normalization. In this study, it was found that the ANN without data normalization showed a smaller error value than the ANN with data normalization. In the network model without data normalization, RMSE values were 3.024, MAE 1.822, R2 0.952 on the training data and RMSE 2.163, MAE 1.233 and R2 0.976 on the test data. Whereas in the ANN with data normalization, the RMSE values were 3.441, MAE 2.318, R2 0.936 in the training data and RMSE 2.785, MAE 2.085 and R2 0.963 in the test data. ANN with normalization provides a simpler architecture, which only requires 1 hidden layer compared to ANN without normalization which requires 2 hidden layer architecture.
KeywordsArtificial Neural Network; Normalization Data; Cohesive Soil; SPT Value; Cone Penetration Test
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.29099/ijair.v5i2.208 |
Article metrics10.29099/ijair.v5i2.208 Abstract views : 727 | PDF views : 182 |
Cite |
Full Text Download
|
References
M. B. Jaksa, “The influence of spatial variability on the geotechnical design properties of a stiff, overconsolidated clay,” Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Adelaide, Aust., no. December, 1995.
J. K. Mitchell and K. Soga, Fundamentals of Soil Behavior, vol. 158, no. 1. 2005.
Z. yu Yin, Y. fu Jin, and Z. qiang Liu, “Practice of artificial intelligence in geotechnical engineering,” J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 407–411, 2020.
Z. Chao, G. Ma, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhu, and H. Hu, “The application of artificial neural network in geotechnical engineering,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 189, no. 2, 2018.
M. J. Sulewska, “Applying artificial neural networks for analysis of geotechnical problems,” Comput. Assist. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 231–241, 2011.
K. Cui and X. Jing, “Research on prediction model of geotechnical parameters based on BP neural network,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 8205–8215, 2019.
T. Gnananandarao, R. K. Dutta, and V. N. Khatri, Application of artificial neural network to predict the settlement of shallow foundations on cohesionless soils, vol. 13. Springer Singapore, 2019.
A. Benali, M. Hachama, A. Bounif, A. Nechnech, and M. Karray, “A TLBO-optimized artificial neural network for modeling axial capacity of pile foundations,” Eng. Comput., no. 0123456789, 2019.
W. Zhang and A. T. C. Goh, “Multivariate adaptive regression splines and neural network models for prediction of pile drivability,” Geosci. Front., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 45–52, 2016.
H. Maizir, R. Suryanita, and H. Jingga, “Estimation of Pile Bearing Capacity of Single Driven Pile in Sandy Soil Using Finite Element and Artificial Neural Network Methods,” Int. J. Appl. Phys. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, 2016.
S. Suman, S. K. Das, and R. Mohanty, “Prediction of friction capacity of driven piles in clay using artificial intelligence techniques,” Int. J. Geotech. Eng., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 469–475, 2016.
R. Ray, D. Kumar, P. Samui, L. B. Roy, A. T. C. Goh, and W. Zhang, “Application of soft computing techniques for shallow foundation reliability in geotechnical engineering,” Geosci. Front., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 375–383, 2021.
M. Rabiei and A. J. Choobbasti, “Innovative piled raft foundations design using artificial neural network,” Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 138–146, 2020.
C. Reale, K. Gavin, L. Librić, and D. Jurić-Kaćunić, “Automatic classification of fine-grained soils using CPT measurements and Artificial Neural Networks,” Adv. Eng. Informatics, vol. 36, no. April, pp. 207–215, 2018.
J. Jayan and D. N. Sankar, “Prediction of Compaction Parameters of Soils Using Artificial Neural Network,” vol. 03, no. October, pp. 368–375, 2016.
J. Lai, J. Qiu, Z. Feng, J. Chen, and H. Fan, “Prediction of Soil Deformation in Tunnelling Using Artificial Neural Networks,” Comput. Intell. Neurosci., vol. 2016, 2016.
B. T. Pham et al., “Development of artificial neural networks for prediction of compression coefficient of soft soil,” Lect. Notes Civ. Eng., vol. 54, pp. 1167–1172, 2020.
A. J. AL-TAIE, A. F. AL-BAYATI, and Z. N. M. TAKI, “Compression Index and Compression Ratio Prediction by Artificial Neural Networks,” J. Eng. [S.l.], vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 96–106, 2017.
R. Kumar Dutta, R. Rani, and T. Gnananandarao, “Prediction of Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Skirted Footing Resting on Sand Using Artificial Neural Networks ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT,” J. Soft Comput. Civ. Eng., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 34–46, 2018.
Y. Erzin and D. Turkoz, “Use of neural networks for the prediction of the CBR value of some Aegean sands,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1415–1426, 2016.
G. Straz and A. Borowiec, “Estimating the unitweight of local organic soils from laboratory tests using artificial neural networks,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 7, 2020.
V. C. Moussas and K. Diamantis, “Predicting uniaxial compressive strength of serpentinites through physical, dynamic and mechanical properties using neural networks,” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng., 2020.
E. Díaz, V. Brotons, and R. Tomás, “Use of artificial neural networks to predict 3-D elastic settlement of foundations on soils with inclined bedrock,” Soils Found., vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1414–1422, 2018.
A. Abbaszadeh Shahri, “An Optimized Artificial Neural Network Structure to Predict Clay Sensitivity in a High Landslide Prone Area Using Piezocone Penetration Test (CPTu) Data: A Case Study in Southwest of Sweden,” Geotech. Geol. Eng., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 745–758, 2016.
B. Alsharari, A. Olenko, and H. Abuel-Naga, “Modeling of electrical resistivity of soil based on geotechnical properties,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 141, p. 112966, 2020.
S. Kostic, N. Vasovic, K. Todorovic, and A. Samcovic, “Application of artificial neural networks for slope stability analysis in geotechnical practice,” 2016 13th Symp. Neural Networks Appl. NEUREL 2016, 2016.
A. Chakraborty and D. D. Goswami, “Slope Stability Prediction using Artificial Neural Network (ANN),” Int. J. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 21845–21848, 2017.
I. Taleb Bahmed, K. Harichane, M. Ghrici, B. Boukhatem, R. Rebouh, and H. Gadouri, “Prediction of geotechnical properties of clayey soils stabilised with lime using artificial neural networks (ANNs),” Int. J. Geotech. Eng., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 191–203, 2019.
A. Abbaszadeh Shahri, “Assessment and Prediction of Liquefaction Potential Using Different Artificial Neural Network Models: A Case Study,” Geotech. Geol. Eng., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 807–815, 2016.
X. Xue and E. Liu, “Seismic liquefaction potential assessed by neural networks,” Environ. Earth Sci., vol. 76, no. 5, 2017.
K. Ram Chandar, V. R. Sastry, and C. Hegde, “A Critical Comparison of Regression Models and Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Ground Vibrations,” Geotech. Geol. Eng., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 573–583, 2017.
L. K. Sharma, V. Vishal, and T. N. Singh, “Developing novel models using neural networks and fuzzy systems for the prediction of strength of rocks from key geomechanical properties,” Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., vol. 102, pp. 158–169, 2017.
A. K. Alzo’ubi and F. Ibrahim, “Predicting Loading–Unloading Pile Static Load Test Curves by Using Artificial Neural Networks,” Geotech. Geol. Eng., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1311–1330, 2019.
M. Koopialipoor, H. Tootoonchi, D. Jahed Armaghani, E. Tonnizam Mohamad, and A. Hedayat, “Application of deep neural networks in predicting the penetration rate of tunnel boring machines,” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., vol. 78, no. 8, pp. 6347–6360, 2019.
H. Abolhosseini, M. Hashemi, and R. Ajalloeian, “Evaluation of geotechnical parameters affecting the penetration rate of TBM using neural network (case study),” Arab. J. Geosci., vol. 13, no. 4, 2020.
R. A. T. M. Ranasinghe, M. B. Jaksa, Y. L. Kuo, and F. Pooya Nejad, “Application of artificial neural networks for predicting the impact of rolling dynamic compaction using dynamic cone penetrometer test results,” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 340–349, 2017.
M. A. Benbouras, R. Mitiche Kettab, H. Zedira, F. Debiche, and N. Zaidi, “Comparing nonlinear regression analysis and artificial neural networks to predict geotechnical parameters from standard penetration test,” Urban. Archit. Constr., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 275–288, 2018.
B. Tarawneh, “Predicting standard penetration test N-value from cone penetration test data using artificial neural networks,” Geosci. Front., 2017.
Y. Erzin and Y. Tuskan, “Prediction of standard penetration test (SPT) value in Izmir, Turkey using radial basis neural network,” Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilim. Derg., pp. 37–41, 2017.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
________________________________________________________
International Journal Of Artificial Intelligence Research
Organized by: Departemen Teknik Informatika
Published by: STMIK Dharma Wacana
Jl. Kenanga No.03 Mulyojati 16C Metro Barat Kota Metro Lampung
phone. +62725-7850671
Fax. +62725-7850671
Email: jurnal.ijair@gmail.com
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.